The ICE train passes through a 190m long de-icing tunnel. Here a total of 40 nozzle blocks have been mounted along the length of the track on either side of the rails. Warm water is sprayed upwards from the nozzles. As the steam rises, the moisture spreads. It’s reminiscent of a shower and spa paradise for trains. This is not about clean locomotives and rolling stock. Rather, this de-icing system ensures safety on the rails.
120 litres per minute for defrosting
procedure is quite simple. The train arrives. Then it says: Hose me down! More
than 120 litres per minute are pressed against the train from below. The jet is
about body temperature and has a pressure of 1 bar. Enough power to spray the
water against the underbody of the train and to defrost ice spots that have
settled along the track during snowfall. The water used is filtered and fed
back into the cycle, i.e. recycled.
39° C Shower
treatment is only necessary at low temperatures. This is because the
undercarriages of Deutsche Bahn trains are regularly serviced and subjected to
ultrasonic testing. At 39° C any snow and ice in the way is
simply defrosted and removed
Drehgestell – Bogie
Düsenstock – Spray Cylinder
Druckluftventil – Compressed-Air Valve
Druckluft- und Elektroleitungen – Compressed Air and Electrical conduits
Wasserröhre – Water pipes
Düsenröhre – Nozzle pipes
Almost 70 nationwide de-icing plants
de-icing of an ICE takes between two to two and a half hours. The chassis can
then be inspected. A short time later the ICE is back on track. There are
almost 70 defrosting and de-icing systems available throughout the German rail
network, in which express and regional trains – in the truest sense of the word
– get mollycoddled.
To prevent the ICEs from freezing in the first place, Frankfurt has had a glycol spraying system that is unique in Germany since 2014: preparation is everything.
For a young model railway enthusiast this must be an ideal course of study. Over the past 3 years the Rhine-Westfalen Technical University (RWTH) in Aachen, Germany has invested over €750.000 in modernizing ELVA – die Eisenbahntechnische Lehr- und Versuchsanlage (the railway technical training and test facility).
On 27th November the facility was officially reopened. Over the next 3 years students and teachers will try to solve how to alleviate problems when things go wrong in a live railroad system; cancellations, signal failure, delays, derailments, etc.
Effective utilization of rail networks is of vital importance not only for passenger, but also for freight transport. ELVA has at its disposition over 1200 m of track. With the aid of computers they will try to simulate the chaos the exists in real railway networks. The aim is to create mathematical models for how to effectively handle this so as to reduce the impact of irregularities on the rest of the network.
Besides railway safety technology, ELVA is able to realistically map railway operations, and remotely control individual trains which allows simulation of the Europe-wide ETCS (European Train Control System) thus enabling mapping of control and safety technology.
If you are interested in model railways, then take the opportunity to visit the world’s largest model railway in Hamburg, Germany; Miniatur Wunderland.This is an incredible site with not only trains, but ships and an airport. For more details follow this link: https://www.miniatur-wunderland.com/
Ethernet is rapidly expanding into industrial environments where equipment must stand up to operating temperatures of -40C to +75C, vibrations, and shocks. These harsh environments are under pressure to share information quickly for increased productivity, improved quality, inventory control, and reduced operational costs.
Ethernet Switch technology plays a critical role in these networks. Following are five questions to ask when choosing your Industrial Ethernet Switch brand.
1. Does the manufacturer use Switch and Phy chips from leading manufacturers to ensure reliability and interoperability with your network?
Check the published MTBF rates on the manufacturer website. This will give you insight about the quality of components used in the design and manufacture of the product.
If the MTBF rates are high, you can have confidence that you will get a reliable product made with quality components. If the MTBF rates are low, or unpublished, proceed with caution.
Perle DIN Rail Switches only use robust and reliable high-end components from leading chip manufacturers to ensure product reliability and network interoperability.
2. Are they built with temperature rated components and fully heat chamber tested?
You need to avoid finding out too late that chosen products are not fully designed to operate in extreme temperatures.
There are a lot of products on the market claiming to operate at -40C to +75C. However, they use “commercial-grade” components that have not been qualified to operate in the claimed temperature ranges. When “commercial-grade” parts are exposed to extremely high or low temperatures, product failures are inevitable.
For example, integrated circuits on the PCB overheat causing premature failure of the product. Or, under-rated connectors do not allow for proper contact between the device and the cables. These failures eventually stop all data communications in these high and low temperature environments.
Every component on every Perle DIN Rail Switch has been designed and tested to handle operating temperatures of -10C to 60C or -40C to 75C.
3. Is there dual input power to provide redundancy during power failures?
Dual power inputs with industrial surge and spike protection reduce downtime when there is primary power loss. Reverse power protection is also recommended.
4. Is the chassis metal or plastic?
A rugged metal housing provides superior EMC performance and corrosion-resistance. You may also want to check that a DIN Rail mounting bracket is included as standard.
5. Does the manufacturer have a range broad enough to ensure that they will have a model to suit your specific environment?
Most manufacturers have a limited range, especially when it comes to supporting fixed fiber ports. Perle has the broadest range of Industrial Ethernet Switches on the market.
With over 700 models, Perle offers every conceivable combination of Ethernet, Fiber & PoE ports in a 5 – 10 port DIN Rail Switch. This makes Perle a one stop shop when it comes to finding the right Industrial Switch for your environment.
If network up-time is vitally important to your success choose quality products with care.
The next step in the evolution of wireless WAN communications – 5G
networks- is about to hit the front pages, and for good reason: it will
complete the evolution of cellular from wireline augmentation to
wireline replacement, and strategically from mobile-first to
So it’s not too early to start least basic planning
to understanding how 5G will fit into and benefit IT plans across
organizations of all sizes, industries and missions.
5G will of course provide end-users with the additional throughput,
capacity, and other elements to address the continuing and dramatic
growth in geographic availability, user base, range of subscriber
devices, demand for capacity, and application requirements, but will
also enable service providers to benefit from new opportunities in
overall strategy, service offerings and broadened marketplace presence.
This article explores the technologies and market drivers behind 5G, with an emphasis on what 5G means to enterprise and organizational IT.
While 5G remains an imprecise term today, key objectives for
the development of the advances required have become clear. These are
As is the case with Wi-Fi, major advances in cellular are first and foremost defined by new upper-bound throughput numbers. The magic number here for 5G is in fact a floor
of 1 Gbps, with numbers as high as 10 Gbps mentioned by some. However,
and again as is the case with Wi-Fi, it’s important to think more in
terms of overall individual-cell and system-wide capacity. We
believe, then, that per-user throughput of 50 Mbps is a more reasonable –
but clearly still remarkable – working assumption, with up to 300 Mbps
peak throughput realized in some deployments over the next five years.
The possibility of reaching higher throughput than that exceeds our
planning horizon, but such is, well, possible.
even more important than throughput, though, is a reduction in the
round-trip time for each packet. Reducing latency is important for
voice, which will most certainly be all-IP in 5G implementations, video,
and, again, in improving overall capacity. The over-the-air latency
goal for 5G is less than 10ms, with 1ms possible in some defined classes
5g network management and OSS
Operators are always seeking to
reduce overhead and operating expense, so enhancements to both system
management and operational support systems (OSS) yielding improvements
in reliability, availability, serviceability, resilience, consistency,
analytics capabilities, and operational efficiency, are all expected.
The benefits of these will, in most cases, however, be transparent to
Mobility and 5G technology
user mobility, to as much as hundreds of kilometers per hour, will be
supported, thus serving users on all modes of transportation. Regulatory
and situation-dependent restrictions – most notably, on aircraft –
however, will still apply.
remains the one aspect of IT where no one is ever done, enhancements to
encryption, authentication, and privacy are expected. It would not be
surprising to see identity management (IDM) solutions along the lines of
those now at work in many organizations available from at least a few
carriers. Current IDM suppliers as well might be more than mildly
interested in extending their capabilities to 5G services purchased by
New spectrum to service 5G
It is expected
that frequencies in the so-called millimeter-wave bands above 30GHz will
see service in at least some 5G deployments. Both licensed and
unlicensed spectrum at these frequencies is available in many parts of
the world. MM wave frequencies are often appropriate to small cells
since they require smaller and less obtrusive antennas, and the inherent
signal directionality can multiply spectral efficiency.
The core disadvantages for MM waves are less applicability to
traditional larger cells along with poor object (e.g., buildings)
penetration, but such can again be advantages in terms of frequency
reuse. Regardless, more spectrum is required given the throughput and
capacity objectives that justify 5G development and deployment – present
spectral allocations will most certainly not suffice even with the
ability to aggregate smaller blocks of spectrum.
New enabling technologies
expect to see higher-order MIMO implementations, sometimes described as
“massive” with, for example, 16-64 streams, more aggressive modulation
and channel coding, improved power-utilization efficiency, and related
advances. Small cells will see frequent application, and the days of
large cell towers may be numbered in more densely populated areas.
Current trends otherwise at work in networks today, include SDN and NFV,
will also see application in 5G, with much infrastructure implemented
within cloud-based services.
5G will likely require no major
advances in chip or manufacturing technologies, and device power
consumption will likely benefit from more limited geographic range even
as higher clock rates take a small toll here. Still, much work remains
in terms of both technical and feasibility analysis as well as cost, but
we see no showstoppers on the horizon. There is no danger of producing
another WiMAX that offers marketing hype with no clear advantages over
the previous generation, and the overall level of technical risk is low.
Perhaps the greatest challenge is schedule slip, as the complex nature
of the systems engineering that is required needs more time than many
5G and IoT
5G as a wireline replacement will have
to support every class of traffic and every conceivable device, from
broadcast-quality video distribution to telemetry, implantable medical
devices, augmented and virtual reality, and advanced interactivity and
graphics – and not just for gaming. The list also includes connected and
autonomous cars, remotely-piloted vehicles (drones), public safety,
building and municipal automation/monitoring/control, and disaster
relief. including relocatable infrastructure with moving cells and
support for dynamic wireless meshing. Also in the mix are robotics and
IoT devices tolerant of limited data throughput and highly-variable
latency. We expect literally tens of billions of 5G devices to be deployed over the next decade or so, so the scale of both the challenge and the demand is clear.
Finally, carriers, operators, and equipment vendors of both infrastructure and subscriber devices simply require
the deployment of new technologies with quantifiable end-user-visible
benefits from time to time in order to continue to grow their
businesses. New subscriber units alone cannot accomplish this goal.
In short, 5G is a business opportunity being designed and implemented to provide all
of the communication capabilities and performance we expect from a
wireline network. Getting to that point, given all of the requirements
above, won’t be easy, quick, or inexpensive.
3G was the last G to have a
formal definition, in this case from the ITU and specifying throughput
of up to 2Mbps. The definition of 4G was never formalized, and there
have even been legal battles over what might be considered 4G, with a
general consensus that LTE and LTE-Advanced, as specified by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP),
serve as an adequate minimum. 3GPP is an industry standards group
consisting of major organizations and associations, with very broad
support and respect across the globe. This group has been a dominant
factor in defining the cellular industry itself since 3G and has driven
other key advances in cellular deployments including an all-IP core,
LTE, LTE-Advanced, and many more.
Given their overall leadership, we expect that the 3GPP will
essentially define 5G from both marketing and operational perspectives,
by the time Release 16 appears, likely in the second half of 2019. The
ITU, through its IMT-2020 program
within ITU-R is also hard at work here, with expected completion of
their work by, oddly enough, 2020. ETSI is also active in 5G, as is one
other organization taking a major role in the debate, the Next
Generation Mobile Networks (NGMN) Alliance, a trade association of
operators and analogous to the Wi-Fi Alliance. Their 5G White Paper
is perhaps the most complete vision and working definition of 5G
published to date. Regardless, some harmonization of the work of this
multiplicity of efforts will clearly be required.
5G vs. LTE
4G ended up being defined by radio technologies, it is possible the 5G
will eventually center on the same. The next-gen technology here begins
with LTE-Advanced Pro, called 4.5G by some, and is initially being
specified in 3GPP Release 13. Further enhancement to LTE Advanced Pro
into what many are currently calling NR (new radio) is likely by Release
15. But practically, and especially from a marketing perspective, the
line between 4G and 5G is already quite blurry.
organizational IT managers and end users will shortly notice that the
marketing of “gigabit LTE” has begun. While this advance is not strictly
5G, it is likely that it will be marketed as such owing to that gigabit
number. While we do expect that some end-users might experience
occasional bursts of throughput above 100Mbps, gigabit LTE cannot
provision the capacity required to meet expectations for regular service
at such levels. Regardless, some locales will see deployments here as
early as the end of this year, and new devices, including Samsung’s
Galaxy S8 and perhaps even the upcoming 2017 iPhone, will include this
technology. Ultimately, though, the fate of such services rests with
each carrier’s plans for their deployment.
radios aren’t the only possibility; among the features mentioned for
inclusion in NR is interworking with Wi-Fi. We might, however, instead
suggest that contemporary Wi-Fi – 802.11ac and the 60GHz802.11ad – is already
5G technology [see previous article], with very high throughput, small
cells, and essentially every other necessary 5G attribute except for OSS
and operation in licensed frequencies. Hard handoff between wide-area
5G technologies and Wi-Fi could become a key 5G deployment strategy
going forward, especially to augment indoor reach and capacity. We might
also suggest that provisioning deterministic association (as opposed to
allowing client devices to decide which AP to associate with, when to
roam, etc.) might be a worthwhile area of endeavor for the Wi-Fi
Barriers to 5G?
ultimate marketplace success of 5G is all but assured, a number of
issues remain. Perhaps the most important among these is the
availability of spectrum sufficient to assure that the broadband promise
of 5G is realized. As we noted above, we expect a significant portion
of the spectrum devoted to 5G, and globally, will be in the
millimeter-wave bands above 30GH, almost certainly including spectrum at
60GHz and ranging up to 70-80GHz or even higher. But how much of which
specific frequencies might become available is the domain of government
regulations, which vary on a national basis. In addition, the proportion
of currently allocated spectrum that might be re-farmed or allocated so
as to coexist with current production systems is also an open question.
The further application of spectrum auctions is also a concern to those
developing 5G business models, given the vast amount of money involved.
And, finally, conflict of the form already being seen in the unlicensed
bands between LTE and Wi-Fi demands workable and effective solutions
Other potential issues include the following:
Backhaul – The capacity of the
interconnect between cells of any form, as well as to the remainder of a
carrier network and the Internet itself, must be commensurate with the
capacity provisioned to subscribers so as to avoid bottlenecks. A major
increase in backhaul capacity is thus in the cards, and we expect the
millimeter-wave bands to see major utilization here as well.
Coexistence and evolution – 3G, 4G, and 5G
will need to coexist for some time, adding complexity to both carrier
networks and end-user devices. The obsolescence of earlier generations
is essential to improved spectral efficiency, so carriers will need to
carefully plan and stage rollouts and upgrades alike.
Other regulatory policies – In addition to
spectrum regulation, other regulations in such domains as net
neutrality, the taxation of communications services, universal service,
and overall national broadband policies will need to be revisited and
perhaps even reconsidered altogether.
Pricing – Finally, we have at present no
idea what form the pricing models for 5G might take. While voice,
messaging, and similar narrowband services will likely remain flat-rate,
the pricing of 50Mbps-plus IP services is unknown. Just as we saw
unlimited data plans vanish only to reappear years later, the
possibility (likelihood?) of such volatility is an element that should
be part of organizational planning going forward, including with respect
to service plans selected under BYOD policies.
Note that 5G
activity continues to build, with even a few field trials now underway,
at least nominally. While sometimes these trials are marketed under that
designation, they are not really early deployments because the
underlying standards, let alone the required hardware and software, do
not yet exist. We do not expect the general availability of 5G much
before the 2020/2021 timeframe, and critical mass, a term we use to
describe reliable availability in major population centers, not
occurring before 2025. And, fear not; while 3G service should begin to
fade around 2025, 4G availability should be good at least until 2030.
Organizations thus have plenty of time to plan and complete the cutover
to 5G, although we expect that mobile-device vendors and carriers may
provide incentives for a more rapid market uptake.
Given the pervasiveness of BYOD initiatives and the fact that they
will continue to be the dominant model for organizational mobile-device
provisioning, most organizational IT departments will ultimately need to
devote only minimal effort to the day-to-day management of end-user
evolution to 5G. Most of the work here should be in updating
reimbursement policies as 5G service plans gel.
should begin to consider what 5G might mean to their own internal
operations. Just as 802.11ac broke the gigabit barrier and eliminated
the need for wired drops to all but a few end-users, 5G may represent
the final cord-cutting for everyone, everywhere. Remember – 5G is about replacement,
not augmentation. And, as we expect 5G to include current-generation
Wi-Fi, organizational investments in in-building networks should be
little affected by the advent of 5G. We do expect at least a few
carriers and operators to get into the managed-services business,
however, offering one-stop shopping for both WLAN and WWAN and even some
value-added services. And high-capacity wired backhaul and interconnect
links will also be unaffected by 5G, at least for the foreseeable
As for the remainder of IT initiatives, including cloud,
virtualization, and more, 5G should be transparent – just another fast
link that also happens to be mobile. 5G, restating our initial thesis
above, is evolutionary, not revolutionary.
Which brings us to a
final point: will there ever be a 6G? Believe it or not, we doubt that
such will be necessary. 5G itself will evolve over time, transparently
incorporating leading-edge innovations like Massive MIMO to continue to
meet the ever-growing demand for wireless connectivity. So, for now,
anyway, it’s safe to conclude that all of us – vendors, carriers and
operators, IT departments, and even end-users – are far enough up the
wireless experience curve that the transition to 5G, despite the
remarkable advance in overall capability, may very well be the smoothest
cellular upgrade ever.
Craig J. Mathias is a principal with Farpoint Group, an advisory firm specializing in wireless networking and mobile computing.
The Wi-Fi alliance has changed the naming
scheme for Wi-Fi standards, abandoning the 802.11 designations for
simpler names like Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 4, etc., but that may gloss
over some of the finer points of the old IEEE system.
Just when we were all getting used to the IEEE 802.11 Wi-Fi nomenclature
that differentiates between generations of the technology, the
industry’s Wi-Fi Alliance has gone and made it simpler and more
digestible for the user on the street.
As a result, starting this month what we know as 802.11ax is officially called Wi-Fi 6.
The new, vastly simplified system also means that 802.11ac is now Wi-Fi 5, and 802.11n is Wi-Fi 4. The idea, according to the Wi-Fi Alliance, is to make matching endpoint and router capabilities a simpler matter for the rank-and-file user of Wi-Fi technology.
Think of it as the unlicensed equivalent to the various Gs – 3G, 4G, 5G
– that the cellular data carriers have rolled out over the years –
broad descriptors of the generation of connectivity tech that it’s in
place on a given device, not specific technical specifications.
What is Wi-Fi 6 good for?
basic technology behind Wi-Fi 6, which is still known as 802.11ax on
the technical side, promises major advances beyond just higher data
rates, including better performance in dense radio environments and
higher power efficiency.
Wi-Fi 6 is also seen as a possible
communications method for internet-of-things (IoT) devices that have low
power capabilities and limited battery life. Thanks to a feature called
target wake time, Wi-Fi 6 IoT devices can shut down their Wi-Fi
connections most of the time and connect only briefly as scheduled in
order to transmit data they’ve gathered since the last time, thus
extending battery life.
Farpoint Group principal and Network World contributor Craig Mathias said that, given the degree to which consumerization is the driving force even behind enterprise IT these days, the re-naming is probably a step in the right direction, but that doesn’t mean that simply labeling 802.11ax as Wi-Fi 6 tells the whole story.
for example, that a given product is ‘Wi-Fi 6’ just specifies which
generation it belongs to, and very little else,” he said. “By analogy,
one can purchase a 2019 Ford Edge. But there are also SE, SEL, Titanium,
and ST models, and numerous options for each of these trim levels. So
saying one has a Ford Edge isn’t really very descriptive at all.”
bigger potential issue, Mathias added, is that presenting different
Wi-Fi technologies via a simple sequential naming convention can mislead
users. 802.11ad and ay are 60GHz standards, with vastly different
characteristics and capabilities than 2.4GHz and 5GHz systems. Simply
calling them “Wi-Fi 7” makes them sound like the next generation of the
same technology, not something that’s fundamentally designed to
accomplish different tasks.
“A number of potential issues arise if linear numbering is taken to imply ‘better,’” he said.
Wi-Fi Alliance says that vendors will be able to incorporate the new
naming scheme in their user interfaces. So as mobile users move from
access point to access point, their screens will use the new numbering
system show the standard that was used to establish the current
The new terminology will also be applied to the Wi-Fi
Alliance’s certification program for wireless products. So, for example,
starting next year if a product meets the 802.11ax standard it will
receive a Wi-Fi CERTIFIED 6 designation.